Players
FM

Miras Assylov

KazakhstanBorn 2008 (age 18)FIDE ID 13728873

Luft classical

2000220024002023202420252026
Monthly Luft ratings, now 2360
FIDE

FIDE classical

1500175020002250250020182020202220242026
Monthly FIDE ratings, now 2397
Luft

Flair

Miras Assylov's classical flairs

0 of 19 earned over the last 12 months

  • TitanLuft classical rating averaging 2800+ over the last 4 years
  • Serial WinnerWon 2+ elite events in the last 12 months
  • UnderdogRegularly beats players rated 50+ higher
  • Fortress25+ games in a row without a loss
  • Black BeltDoes better with black than with white
  • IronmanPlayed 50+ games over the last 12 months
  • RisingAged 18 or under, Luft rating up 40+ over the last 12 months
  • Endgame SpecialistEndgame 90+: converting, saving and not throwing endgames
  • TacticianTactics 90+: sharp, tactical games they made sharp
  • LightningTop 20 at speed chess (mostly blitz, some rapid)
  • Hot StreakAt least 6 points from 7 straight games against strong opposition
  • SignatureSticks to one defence with black far more than most
  • ChameleonPlays a wide range of defences with black
  • WildcardBrilliant one event, off the next: hard to predict
  • ReliableConsistent across all top events
  • FighterRarely draws, and wins far more than they lose
  • AdaptableTactics and Positional both 90+
  • PositionalPositional 90+: slow, quiet games they steered
  • PodiumTop 3 in at least half of their elite events

No classical flair in the last year yet.

Trophy cabinet

No classical titles on record yet.

Attributes

Tactics 64Positional 66Endgame 74Openings 66Composure 64Defence 68Speed 56Consistency 62

Luft classical rating

2360No. 421

From 12 classical games in top events over the last year, playing at a 2315 level.

ResultsPlayed at a 2315 level, blended with their FIDE rating−16
Tournament winsNone in the last year0
FormThe last 3 months against the whole year−10
ConsistencyHow steady they are from event to event−5
Activity12 classical games in top events−6

Openings

Their most-played, from 12 classical games in top events over the last 4 years

OpeningGamesScore
Ruy Lopez30%
Sicilian Defense275%
Petrov's Defense150%

Ruy Lopez

With White: 3 games, won 0, drew 0, lost 3 · 0%

VariationGamesScore
Morphy Defense30%

Sicilian Defense

With White: 2 games, won 1, drew 1, lost 0 · 75%

VariationGamesScore
Najdorf Variation275%

Petrov's Defense

With White: 1 game, won 0, drew 1, lost 0 · 50%

VariationGamesScore
Cozio Attack150%

Ruy Lopez

With Black: 3 games, won 0, drew 1, lost 2 · 17%

VariationGamesScore
Closed225%
Morphy Defense10%

Sicilian Defense

With Black: 2 games, won 0, drew 0, lost 2 · 0%

VariationGamesScore
French Variation10%
Taimanov Variation10%

Indian Defense

With Black: 1 game, won 0, drew 1, lost 0 · 50%

VariationGamesScore
London System150%

Recent events

EventPlace+/−+/−
Atyrau Open 202620 Oct 20261/6−10−9
Aktobe Open 202611 Jun 20262/60+1

Best wins

OpponentRating
GMD. Bocharov9 Jun 2026 · Aktobe Open 20262540

Most played

OpponentGamesWDL
GMA. DemchenkoLast 3 Jun 2026 · Aktobe Open 20261010
IMA. StribukLast 4 Jun 2026 · Aktobe Open 20261001
GMS. AzarovLast 7 Jun 2026 · Aktobe Open 20261001
GMD. BocharovLast 9 Jun 2026 · Aktobe Open 20261100
GMM. PetkovLast 10 Jun 2026 · Aktobe Open 20261010

Compare Luft

MA
FMMiras AssylovKazakhstan

Pick a player to compare with Miras Assylov

How attributes are calculated

From their games in top events over the last 12 months, each judged against the opponent's rating

  • TacticsHow well they score in sharp games they chose to make sharp.
  • PositionalHow well they score in quiet, manoeuvring games they steered.
  • EndgameHow they do in endgames against what the position promised when it began: converting a winning one earns a little, saving a losing one earns a lot, and throwing a winning one costs a lot.
  • OpeningsThe engine's verdict on their position around moves 15 to 20, against what's normal for that colour, as the score it points to. Over the last 4 years, with older games counting less.
  • ComposureHow well they score under pressure: the game straight after a loss, and the last 3 games of an event while they can still win it. Over the last 4 years.
  • DefenceHow they do in games where they were 0.8 pawns or more worse after move 18, against what that position usually scores: holding the draw earns, turning it around earns more, and losing costs a little.
  • SpeedTheir Luft rapid and blitz ratings. With neither, an estimate a little below their classical level.
  • ConsistencyTheir Luft rating, less their off days: tournaments (5+ games each) over the last 4 years where they played 50+ below it. Anything better never counts against them.

  • "How well they score" is a performance rating: the opponent's rating, plus 400 for a win and minus 400 for a loss, averaged. So it's always judged against who they played.

    The score out of 100: 80 is a 2600 level, and each 13 rating points adds one, so 2860 and up is 100.

    Fair to everyone: with only a few games of a kind, the result leans towards their overall Luft rating. Strengths and weaknesses are measured against their overall level and compared with the top 100, so a specialist's best side stands out. A little recent form is added to all but Speed.