Players
IM

Eldiyar Orozbaev

KyrgyzstanBorn 2006 (age 20)FIDE ID 13802240

FIDE classical

15001750200022502500201620182020202220242026
Monthly FIDE ratings, now 2338

Trophy cabinet

Eldiyar Orozbaev's classical titles

1 classical title, newest first

  • Kyrgyz Championship 20231st
  • Kyrgyz Championship 

Luft classical rating

Not ranked yet: the Luft classical rating needs at least 10 classical games in top events over the last year.

Openings

No classical games with a known opening in our archive yet.

Recent events

EventPlace+/−+/−
46th FIDE Chess Olympiad Samarkand 202627 Sep 20266/10+16+16
Asian Individual Chess Championship 202631 May 2026=88th−6−5
45th Chess Olympiad Budapest 202421 Sep 20246½/10+27+27

Best wins

OpponentRating
GMJ. Cardoso Cardoso19 Sep 2024 · 45th Chess Olympiad Budapest 20242508
IMT. Vandenbussche20 Sep 2024 · 45th Chess Olympiad Budapest 20242461
IMA. Greet27 Sep 2026 · 46th FIDE Chess Olympiad Samarkand 20262416
FMD. Alho24 Sep 2026 · 46th FIDE Chess Olympiad Samarkand 20262212
IMS. Loay18 Sep 2024 · 45th Chess Olympiad Budapest 20242194

Most played

OpponentGamesWDL
L. ThomasLast 11 Sep 2024 · 45th Chess Olympiad Budapest 20241100
GML. LivaicLast 12 Sep 2024 · 45th Chess Olympiad Budapest 20241010
M. FayzanLast 13 Sep 2024 · 45th Chess Olympiad Budapest 20241100
GMJ. SubeljLast 14 Sep 2024 · 45th Chess Olympiad Budapest 20241001
CMJ. DarmaninLast 15 Sep 2024 · 45th Chess Olympiad Budapest 20241100

Compare Luft

EO
IMEldiyar OrozbaevKyrgyzstan

Pick a player to compare with Eldiyar Orozbaev

How attributes are calculated

From their games in top events over the last 12 months, each judged against the opponent's rating

  • TacticsHow well they score in sharp games they chose to make sharp.
  • PositionalHow well they score in quiet, manoeuvring games they steered.
  • EndgameHow they do in endgames against what the position promised when it began: converting a winning one earns a little, saving a losing one earns a lot, and throwing a winning one costs a lot.
  • OpeningsThe engine's verdict on their position around moves 15 to 20, against what's normal for that colour, as the score it points to. Over the last 4 years, with older games counting less.
  • ComposureHow well they score under pressure: the game straight after a loss, and the last 3 games of an event while they can still win it. Over the last 4 years.
  • DefenceHow they do in games where they were 0.8 pawns or more worse after move 18, against what that position usually scores: holding the draw earns, turning it around earns more, and losing costs a little.
  • SpeedTheir Luft rapid and blitz ratings. With neither, an estimate a little below their classical level.
  • ConsistencyTheir Luft rating, less their off days: tournaments (5+ games each) over the last 4 years where they played 50+ below it. Anything better never counts against them.

  • "How well they score" is a performance rating: the opponent's rating, plus 400 for a win and minus 400 for a loss, averaged. So it's always judged against who they played.

    The score out of 100: 80 is a 2600 level, and each 13 rating points adds one, so 2860 and up is 100.

    Fair to everyone: with only a few games of a kind, the result leans towards their overall Luft rating. Strengths and weaknesses are measured against their overall level and compared with the top 100, so a specialist's best side stands out. A little recent form is added to all but Speed.